Washington — U.S. President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to supply Ukraine with Tomahawk cruise missiles, a move that could mark a major escalation in the war with Russia and push Moscow toward negotiations.

The plan follows high-level talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who is in Washington with top aides to press for stronger air defenses, energy resilience, and long-range strike capabilities. “The main topics will be air defense and our long-range capabilities, to maintain pressure on Russia,” Zelensky said ahead of the meeting.

Trump’s decision comes on the heels of his Middle East diplomacy, where he brokered a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict and celebrated the release of hostages in Tel Aviv. In remarks to Israel’s parliament, he signaled a shift in focus: “It would be great if we could make a peace deal with Iran… First, we have to get Russia done.”

At the center of the debate are Tomahawk missiles, with a range of 1,500 miles and the ability to evade radar. Analysts say they could allow Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory, targeting supply lines and weapons factories. Trump has hinted at the stakes, warning that if the war drags on, “I’m going to send them Tomahawks.”

Moscow has condemned the idea, warning it would “ruin relations with Washington.” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov raised fears over the missiles’ nuclear compatibility, saying Russia would have no way to know if they carried warheads.

NATO allies, while supportive of Ukraine, are quietly preparing for worst-case scenarios. One official described the alliance as “bracing for WW3” if Russian retaliation spirals out of control.

Supporters argue the move could force Putin to the table, tipping the balance toward peace. Critics warn it risks dangerous escalation. For now, the world watches as Trump weighs a decision that could reshape the conflict — and Europe’s security.

Would you like me to also reframe this into a short breaking-news style bulletin (just a few sharp paragraphs for quick reading), or keep it in this more detailed article format?

By endtim